Commission Concludes Auckland Airport Over-charging

Commission concludes Auckland Airport over-charging by $190 million

The Commerce Commission has published its final report on Auckland Airport’s 2022 – 2027 price-setting event.

The report concluded that the Airport’s forecast revenue was excessive, and its targeted returns were unreasonably high, but its forecast investment fell within a reasonable range.

Commissioner Vhari McWha said that while the Commission did not regulate the prices set by the Airport, the review helped determine if the Airport’s pricing decisions and expected performance promoted the long-term benefit of consumers.

“The Airport is targeting excess profit of about NZD 190 million and its charges are too high, with businesses and consumers likely to end up carrying much of the cost-burden,” sid McWha.

The excess profit represented a targeted return of 8.73 percent from priced aeronautical activities — for example, aircraft landing and passenger terminal charges — compared to the Commission’s estimated reasonable return of between 7.3 percent and 7.8 percent.

“Price increases will fund investment needed to improve customer experience, build more resilient infrastructure and add additional capacity, but the increases are higher than what is needed to achieve these outcomes.”

Among Auckland Airport’s projects has been a new domestic terminal to replace the almost 60-year-old existing domestic terminal building. Integrated with the international terminal, the Airport will improve service quality and customer experience, especially for transit passengers, and provide capacity for long-term growth in passenger numbers.

Regarding the cost of its investment plan, McWha said the airport followed appropriate processes.

"While views on the type, size and timing of the investment differ among the Airport’s customers, our analysis shows Auckland Airport engaged multiple third-party experts to assist with costing its investment plan and considered a wide range of options for its new terminal building,” she added.

“There are a range of investment outcomes that are consistent with what we’d expect to see in a competitive market. This range reflects uncertainty about future demand and choices about factors such as service quality. We are satisfied that Auckland Airport’s decision is within this range.”

The Commission also concluded that a different approach to recovering the new terminal infrastructure depreciation would better serve consumers’ interests.

Depreciation refers to how capital investment is recovered through airport charges over time. This approach would lower charges in the short term and be more consistent with outcomes in a competitive market.

Auckland Airport has signalled it will reconsider this issue when it next sets prices, and the Commission is satisfied this is sufficient to capture most of the investment value.

The Commission’s final conclusions are largely in keeping with its draft conclusions, which were published in July last year.

More local New Zealand news here