A bill to remove alcohol trading restrictions on certain public holidays will require more conversation about the broader impacts.
Parliament is considering Hon Kieran McAnulty’s bill to remove alcohol trading restrictions on Good Friday, Easter Sunday, Christmas Day and ANZAC Day morning. Positioned as a practical update to dated legislation, the proposal appears operational on the surface. Yet the conversation it prompts is considerably broader, extending beyond licensing into how New Zealand chooses to recognise the few days that still sit apart from the commercial calendar.
It is often assumed that liberalising trade is simply the natural progression of a modern economy. New Zealand is more globally connected, more service-oriented and more reliant on tourism than when many of these restrictions were first conceived. However, the suggestion that international visitors expect uninterrupted availability does not fully align with global practice. The international landscape is far less uniform than the phrase “modern economy” implies.
Across much of Europe, restricted trading remains an intentional policy decision rather than a regulatory oversight. Germany continues to enforce widespread Sunday closures under long-established laws designed to protect rest, family time and civic life. Austria maintains similar rules, with most retail prohibited from opening on Sundays and public holidays outside of tightly defined exceptions such as transport hubs. Poland moved against the deregulation trend when it introduced progressive Sunday trading bans in 2018, framing the policy around social stability and worker wellbeing.
Even markets regarded as commercially liberal demonstrate restraint where symbolism carries weight. In parts of Australia, including Victoria, most retailers cannot open until early afternoon on ANZAC Day. The delayed start is deliberate; it preserves the morning for commemoration before the commercial day begins.
The underlying message is straightforward: advanced economies do not all operate on a constant trading cycle. Many accept limited inconvenience in exchange for maintaining shared civic markers and predictable downtime for workers.
This is not an argument against hospitality, nor against responsible alcohol service. It is an invitation to consider what anchors a nation’s calendar when even its most symbolic days begin to look commercially ordinary. Once distinctions are removed, they are rarely reinstated.
New Zealand can clearly operate year-round. The more relevant question is whether constant availability is desirable, and what may gradually be lost if no day is deliberately set apart from the everyday rhythm of trade.
More news here.
